Trump’s leadership is based on interviews with four former Trump administration officials who asked not to be named because of fear of retaliation. This account of the department’s final days under Mr. Trump’s allies had falsely said was working with Venezuela to flip votes from Mr. Rosen to appoint special counsels, including one who would look into Dominion Voting Systems, a maker of election equipment that Mr. The previously unknown chapter was the culmination of the president’s long-running effort to batter the Justice Department into advancing his personal agenda. Trump’s reality show “The Apprentice,” albeit one that could prompt a constitutional crisis. Clark made their competing cases to him in a bizarre White House meeting that two officials compared with an episode of Mr. Rosen in place, calculating that a furor over mass resignations at the top of the Justice Department would eclipse any attention on his baseless accusations of voter fraud. Their informal pact ultimately helped persuade Mr. The department officials, convened on a conference call, then asked each other: What will you do if Mr. Trump was about to decide whether to fire Mr. Rosen had refused the president’s entreaties to carry out those plans, Mr. ![]() Trump’s continuing legal battles and the pressure on Georgia politicians. The unassuming lawyer who worked on the plan, Jeffrey Clark, had been devising ways to cast doubt on the election results and to bolster Mr. Rosen as acting attorney general and wield the department’s power to force Georgia state lawmakers to overturn its presidential election results. WASHINGTON - The Justice Department’s top leaders listened in stunned silence this month: One of their peers, they were told, had devised a plan with President Donald J. Follow live updates on the House committee hearing on the Jan.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |